>>5315810 6793

>Amy Berman Jackson

>>5315767 6793

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/363964-conservative-group-seeks-removal-of-judge-from-case-targeting-mueller-citing

In particular, Klayman argues that Jackson exhibited a “deep-seated favoritism toward Democrat political interests” and Hillary Clinton, Trump’s Democratic opponent in the presidential race, when she dismissed a case he litigated on behalf of the parents of two Americans killed in the 2012 Benghazi terror attacks.

In that case, the plaintiffs alleged that Clinton’s use of a private email server to transmit sensitive information during her time as secretary of State led to the deaths of their sons.

They also alleged that Clinton defamed the fallen Americans when she publicly disputed their accounts of the circumstances around the attack on the campaign trail. Jackson dismissed the lawsuit in May.

Klayman also argues that Jackson “rushed” to issue an order to show cause in the FreedomWatch case against the Justice Department, which he says “evidences her mindset of having pre-judged this matter from the inception.”

>>5316148

just a little bit more on ABJ…

https://today.law.harvard.edu/amy-berman-jackson-79-nominated-to-a-seat-on-u-s-district-court-for-the-district-of-columbia/

(as of July 15, 2010)

Amy Berman Jackson is currently a Member of Trout Cacheris, PLLC, in Washington, D.C., where she specializes in complex criminal and civil trials and appeals. Prior to joining Trout Cacheris in 2000, she was an associate and then a partner at Venable, Baetjer, Howard, and Civiletti.

Would it be a conincident then that….

https://www.rferl.org/a/US_Law_Firm_Begins_Probe_Of_Former_Ukrainian_Government_Spending/2066719.html

(June 9, 2010)

A U.S. law firm has begun an investigation into the expenditures of the former Ukrainian government headed by defeated presidential candidate Yulia Tymoshenko, RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service reports.

The firm, Trout Cacheris PLLC, was commissioned last month to conduct the probe by the present Ukrainian government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov.

One of the firm's founders, Plato Cacheris, said in Kyiv today that it is an investigation, not an audit, and that his firm does not have a bias toward any Ukrainian leader.

Cacheris declined to specify how much the services of his law firm will cost Ukrainian taxpayers, or the number of experts involved, as "the figure might change."

"We are sensitive to the cost to the Ukrainian people and we will try to do our best to hold those costs down, but we are in fact investigating whether other moneys have been misspent to the detriment of the Ukrainian people," Cacheris said.

Tymoshenko earlier expressed doubts that Trout Cacheris was fit to undertake the Ukrainian investigation.

Cacheris previously defended Monica Lewinsky during the 1998 sex scandal involving then-U.S. President Bill Clinton.

One of Tymoshenko's cabinet colleagues, former deputy Prime Minister Hryhoriy Nemyria, told a press-conference in Kyiv today that the government is spending budget resources on the political persecution of the opposition. He also said he believes the investigation will not be transparent.

Trout Cacheris says its leading lawyers are former U.S. Department of Justice prosecutors with extensive experience in national and international investigations who meet the highest standards of professional excellence.

The Azarov government expects to receive the results of the probe into spending by Tymoshenko's government by September of this year.

>>5316271

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/roger-stone-instagram-judge-photo

Early in Stone's case, prosecutors designated it as "related" to a prosecution brought by Mueller's office last year against Russian nationals accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee and giving information to WikiLeaks via the online persona Guccifer 2.0 — actually Russians, according to the government — during the 2016 presidential election. The DNC hacking case was already assigned to Jackson, and by marking Stone's case as "related," that meant it got assigned to Jackson as well under the court's rules.

Stone challenged the "related" designation, arguing there was no direct connection between his case and the defendants and alleged facts in the DNC hacking case. Prosecutors countered that Stone's case and the DNC hacking case involved common search warrants and underlying events — that the alleged interference by Russians in the 2016 election was the subject of the congressional investigation that Stone is charged with trying to obstruct.

>>5316271

Even presided over a case involving a member of Nancy P's security detail…

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/latest-news/article10434356.html

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by an unhappy former member of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s security detail.

In a 27-page decision issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson rejected claims by former U.S. Capitol Police officer Luanne Lynn Moran that her supervisors had fired her in retaliation for filing complaints against fellow officers.

Capitol Police leaders, Jackson concluded, “advanced a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason” for Moran’s termination.

The tensions seem to date back as far as January 2005, when Moran filed an administrative complaint alleging that she had been discriminated against on basis of sex when she was denied a request to transfer to Pelosi’s protective detail. This complaint was eventually settled, and Moran was assigned to protect Pelosi, then the House speaker, in 2007.

In 2008, Moran filed two separate administrative complaints with the Capitol Police Office of Professional Responsibility. One complaint alleged a supervisor had made “sexually inappropriate comments to and about other female employees,” according to Jackson.

That same year, another agent filed a complaint against Moran, alleging Moran had called her “trash” and had told her to “get the f*** away from” Moran’s truck while on a protective detail in Washington, D.C. While on a protective detail in Napa, Calif., this other agent complained, Moran had allegedly said the agent should be shot with a BB gun.

Moran faced other complaints, as well.

Moran disputed the accounts concerning the comments about the other agent, leading to an inquiry in which supervisors concluded she had not been truthful.

“Two witnesses confirmed that Moran had used profanity,”Jackson recounted.

Moran was terminated in October 2011.

“The reason offered by defendant – its determination that plaintiff was untruthful during an official investigation – would constitute a legitimate, non-retaliatory basis for plaintiff’s termination, especially in light of defendant’s policies and the manner in which similar cases have been handled by defendant,” Jackson wrote.