WE ARE THE NEWS NOW!
Anons were onto him.
You are also an Anon. You found him.
Lets teach ANTIFA some lessons this time.
>From what I understand about the complexities, opaqueness and length of counterintelligence investigations, I’d be surprised if Mueller was able to uncover the breadth of this conspiracy. More digging will have to be done. But there’ll be crimes. And we better get to see them.
>When will this illegal Joseph McCarthy style Witch Hunt, one that has shattered so many innocent lives, ever end-or will it just go on forever? After wasting more than $40,000,000 (is that possible?), it has proven only one thing-there was NO Collusion with Russia. So Ridiculous!
After two years and Millions of $$$$, they still want to dig deeper.
Conclude the Witch Hunt already.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/schiffting-to-phase-2-of-collusion-11550794762
>Schiffting to Phase 2 of Collusion
>Conspiracy theorists look for something new, anticipating a Mueller letdown.
>There’s been no more reliable regurgitator of fantastical Trump-Russia collusion theories than Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff. So when the House Intelligence Committee chairman sits down to describe a “new phase” of the Trump investigation, pay attention. These are the fever swamps into which we will descend after Robert Mueller’s probe.
The collusionists need a “new phase” as signs grow that the special counsel won’t help realize their reveries of a Donald Trump takedown. They had said Mr. Mueller would provide all the answers. Now that it seems they won’t like his answers, Democrats and media insist that any report will likely prove “anticlimactic” and “inconclusive.” “This is merely the end of Chapter 1,” said Renato Mariotti, a CNN legal “analyst.”
-
They know that Mueller report is nothingburger. New Narrative creation.
Conclude the Witch Hunt this week.
>If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
>If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
Oh You.
Why are new investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he's stated for almost (2) years, 'evidence' exists that ties POTUS to Russia?
If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
First they pushed for a SC.
Now they claim the SC didn't look deep enough?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT?
-
DAMAGE CONTROL IN EXERCISE!!
>Are new investigations designed to be an 'insurance' extension?
Hahaha, extending the insurance to new dimensions. What premium do they pay, Q?