Rational analysis of the last two Q drop. We know something very fishy went on at the infamous tarmac meeting. But what we don't know is what was discuss or what was offered. Q and Trump Chimed in and affirm that LL was offered RGB seat at the Supreme court. OK…..
Where is the evidence for this? This is a very big accusation. I think we should demand more than just affirmation without confirmation. You know just being rational here.
>simply having a private meeting shows appearance of impropriety and wrongdoing, especially for top US AG; what was discussed is almost irrelevant.
Yes and no. It was absolutely improper. But for the rest it is just pure speculation…… Until some evidence to the contrary emerge. Q and Trump made some Very serious accusation……. So where is the sauce? This is not a religion, I need more than just unsupported accusation.
Yes indeed…. But as stated by Q in an earlier post… a Journalist was conveniently tip off and present at the time. So……. Where is the sauce?
We have no idea if his is even true to begin with. This is all based on Q and Trump affirmation…. Without anything to back it up. I'm not going to start to look for a ghost.
Just wondering if the Orthodox church could be a good alternative for Catholic? I think theirs priest can get married. So maybe they have less pervert on the payroll.
I agree 100% with what you have said. It is all verifiable. What is not verifiable is that she was offered a Supreme court seat for her complicity. This his the kind of thing that can back fire big time if it is never proven.