On the RIGGED judge selection process in federal courts (TLDR at the end):
Every federal district in the United States (there are around 100 federal districts) has its own internal process for assigning judges to cases. That process includes conflict of interest checking, and so on. You would have to call each court to ask how their process works, but most use (or claim to use) a “random” system run by computers — that is, they enter a new case into a computer and magically, a judge gets assigned to the case. For anyone with even a basic knowledge of programming, the potential for RIGGING the judge selection process is therefore a severe risk.
Consider the following examples…
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS — “randomly assigned” to Michael Flynn’s case after his participation in the FISA process as a judge. Even assuming arguendo that Contreras is not a corrupt judge, he brought prejudicial knowledge to the Flynn case that any other judge who was not tied into the Flynn case would not have had. Recall the Strzok-Page texts where they were celebrating “Rudy” and trying to setup a dinner with him. CONTRERAS was one of ~15 judges sitting on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Therefore, there was a 1 in 15 chance of him being “randomly” assigned to Flynn’s case, or 6.667% (digits confirm). The odds are even lower for CONTRERAS landing the case if you include the senior judges. By a pure coincidence, CONTRERAS was appointed by HUSSEIN. CONTRERAS was recused from the Flynn case in late 2017 – it’s unclear whether CONTRERAS recused himself or was ordered to step aside.
AMY BERMAN JACKSON — JACKSON is currently presiding over Roger Stone’s trial. By a stroke of luck, she also presided over Paul Manafort’s trial. I’ll let the math-fags handle the odds of this one. JACKSON was appointed by an in-the-closet Kenyan national masquerading as the 44th President of our great country.
RICHARD STEARNS — This is my favorite, although it does not involve our great POTUS. STEARNS is a judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Prior to becoming a federal judge, STEARNS was an assistant U.S. Attorney in Boston during the 1980s. Know where this is going? STEARNS was part of the organized crime task force. Oddly, he was “randomly” assigned to the trial of none other than James “Whitey” Bulger. STEARNS repeatedly denied recusal motions filed by Bulger’s attorneys and the issue became quite contentious. The First Circuit ruled that STEARNS had to recuse because a reasonable person could question STEARNS’ impartiality. Former SCOTUS Justice Souter wrote the opinion. There were a total of 14 district judges, including STEARNS, who could’ve landed the Bulger case — the odds of this coincidence are even lower if you include the many senior judges on the court.
TLDR:
The judge selection process at multiple federal district courts is RIGGED. When sensitive cases come up, the deep state always seems to find a way to get a federal judge who will look out for the traitors’ interests. They hide behind the COMPUTER. They claim the judge selection process is “random.” It is manifestly not random — it is RIGGED. This is how they always win. All it takes is some subtle moves by a district court judge and an entire case can be corrupted.