This whole thing about the blood is a mystery to anon.

Have written about it before.

Blood drinking will do nothing to extend human lifespan.

There is not a single study that suggests otherwise.

The study linked in the NYPost story has nothing to do with blood drinking

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0457-8/metrics

The article Q linked in the NY Post is idiotic - no untypical Tabloid reporting - make shit up sell papers.

Ambrosia treatment was a clinical trial - did not use blood -

blood did not sell for $ 8000 a liter - blood was not used in the protocol plasma was, but IT was not priced at 8 k a liter either.

Does the reporter ask "what were the results of the treatment? "

This ooking about blood gets posted here over and over, and it is wrong, every time, and no one bother to fact check or correct. MSM tier reporting. That embarrasses us all or it should.

the real question for anon is why did Q link a fake news story about blood drinking in NY Post?

Does anyone have any idea?

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1038465404572758017

Cultists may well drink children's blood, they rape and torture them - but if they do drink children's blood, they do not do it to treat aging; they do it for their own unHoly reasons because drinking blood, young, old, straight or on the rocks ,will do SHIT for longevity.

So what's with this bullshit?

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1038465404572758017

https://nypost.com/2018/09/10/young-blood-could-be-the-secret-to-long-lasting-health-study/?utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow

>>5323069

svd

>>5323210

Parabiosis is transfusion

Blood drinking destroys proteins (blood factors) in the stomach

Anon spent a year an a half researching this subject

anon wanted to know why, when we knew how to treat aging, we weren't.

"Irina Conboy wanted to confirm her husband’s conjecture that pro-aging and pro-rejuvenation factors exist in the blood of old and young animals using a surgical technique called “parabiosis” (para, beside, biosis, living) to join the circulatory systems of two mice. Since in this proposed experiment the mice sharing their common blood supply would be of different ages to allow scientists to study the effect of exposure to one another’s blood, it would be called “heterochronic parabiosis (hetero, different, chronic, ages).

Today, before a researcher can conduct an experiment using animals that may or must die, he or she must submit a written protocol describing the proposed experiment to an institutional committee for review. In order to be approved the protocol document must include a comprehensive description of anesthetic, analgesic, and surgical methodology and postsurgical care. It must include a historical review of the procedure and the scientific rationale that necessitates it, as well as evidence of the surgeon’s training, prior experience, and skill. In the case of parabiotic surgery, where the mortality is high, the requirements for approval are particularly demanding.