Just for those who care:
>pastebin.com/3YwyKxJE
is not an accurate resource, as there are several errors in there. Anon who maintains it doesn't care to correct them, and rather lets his friends "vouch" for him.
>>89476
Don't know how he screwed it up, must be manual work involved instead of clean pure scripting.
But several, yes. I don't use his work, as I have my own, but for two examples:
Q never used the word "indide", and neither "cross-border".
Tried to tell the anon several times, but he's famefagging instead, and lets his friends "vouch" for him. I have no need to prove myself (and do the job for him).
Don't like splitting hairs, but when archiving is concerned, accuracy is important (e.g. what if stringers/codes were inaccurate?)
I'll prepare a pastebin. May take me some 20 mins or so, as I first have to finish something else.