Now I see why Weinstein was attacked ruthlessly the way he was – without any solid documentation of serious wrongdoing.
This hispanic - black (Sweet is a black surname from what I've seen) female was slated to get his company all along, pushed by Obama.
Gimme an effin' break. Issues about Jewish mothers are pretty well known, but Satanism and MKULTRA are not those issues. It's a lot more Weinstein's company than it is properly the company of this black-hispanic-female person whom it was given to.
The A-list "properties" are only that because of deals they made knowing and willingly. There might be some child abuse. But in the case of Weinstein, he asked women to do certain sexual things. They were adults and could say no. But the deal was that if they said no, he would not make them movie stars. And he did what he promised (even though it wasn't a clear promise) for those who did as he asked.
Spare me the sympathy for the poor Hollywood A-listers. This whole thing has taught me that with few exceptions they are whores. I used to suspect it, now we know.
Last I checked, the proof of blackballing was pretty sketchy. He didn't have the power to blackball, but he did maybe say that some woman refused him. If another producer liked that integrity and independence, that producer would be more likely hire her. If (as is likely) there are no such producers, it's not Weinstein's fault that the whole industry is like that.