>>5327732 (/pb)
Anons, there are 17 PEDO-sta emails containing the word "puppy."
Results for are all 17 can be seen here - https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=Puppy&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
I have to run but, for now, but I just pulled up the first one, from Mark Childress to PEDO-sta, in which Childress says – on January 16, 2014 – that he's "on the road to get a new puppy."
Sauce - https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/58663
Several questions come to my mind:
First, who TF is Mark Childress?
Second, wasn't January 16, 2014, just a week or two before the 2014 "Superb Owl"?
Third, do we know if Childress, in fact, procured a real canine in that time period, or was he out picking up fresh meat for the "Superb Owl"??
Fourth, was this, instead, just code to PEDO-sta?
Fifth, if Childress legitimately just procured a puppy – a real dog – then why in tar nation would that be newsworthy enough for him to include in an email to PEDO-sta? It doesn't seem normal in an email exchange between two adult professionals.
For what it's worth, Q and Anons, I'm the wimpy faggot who was upset over having to take my dog to the vet for euthanasia the other night. I was upset because I loved her a lot, and I had nobody nearby with whom I could share my grief. You sweet people helped me so much. Thank you. My post was from my heart and did not involve code of any kind. I was just grieving and I was alone, and I was trying to get strong enough to take my dog on her final RideInTheCar.
Thank you, all you kind Anons, for letting me turn to you. You were so helpful.
And a big "thanks" to you, Q, for your compassionate support that you gave me that night in post #2821.
Kinda ironic that the first thing I contribute upon my return deals with the possibly coded PEDO-sta emails involving the word, "puppy," but let's dig.
Onward and upward, and WWG1WGA. I love you fags.