The attacking missile is alleged to be a Trident II SLBM.
See https://cdn.qmap.pub/images/5e7081b304f5114985a5d20bc1b819c792b5ddf0be6990975d74430d586ab121.png
Anons - Do your own research.
Search for: solid rocket motor propellant aluminum exhaust
Search for: SLBM propellant
Search for: Trident II propellant
Search for images: SLBM exhaust plume
Search for images: Trident II exhaust plume
Examples:
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88635main_H-2330.pdf
https://www.starmolecule.com/faq/rocket-fuel/
https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/d-5.htm
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Dahlgren/Dahlgren_Centennial/Blog/SLBM/
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-limits-of-u-s-missile-defense/
https://www.liquisearch.com/solid-fuel_rocket/propellant_families/minimum-signature_smokeless_propellants
The image is of a Trident II D-5
Image source: https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/d-5.htm
Contrast the (embedded) image of a Trident II missile in flight with the skunkbayweather.com image.
There is no exhaust plume in the skunkbayweather.com image, only a dead-straight streak of light and backscatter from clouds and fog of a time-integrated airborne light source.
The Trident II missile has a conspicuous plume caused by aluminum in the propellant.
Smokeless solid rocket motor propellants are still in the research phase.
The skunkbayweather.com image is not of a Trident II or any other SLBM/ICBM.
Q - Please help us out here. Anons want to know!
Image Source: Source: https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Dahlgren/Dahlgren_Centennial/Blog/SLBM/
This Trident II missile almost looks like it might be trying to make a Q with its exhaust plume.
Image Source: https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Dahlgren/Dahlgren_Centennial/Blog/SLBM/
Q is implying AF1 was attacked by a Trident II SLBM, which is not designed to target aircraft, but large, stationary targets like cities or military installations.
Is Q implying the intent was to detonate a nuclear weapon just close enough to destroy AF1?
Does that make sense? (No)
Assassinations need to look like accidents (or implicate Russia somehow).
Q - Please help us out here. Anons want to know!
See https://cdn.qmap.pub/images/5e7081b304f5114985a5d20bc1b819c792b5ddf0be6990975d74430d586ab121.png
We are already up to our armpits with disinformation from the internet, and this is not helping.
Q - We are keeping an eye out for you to keep us abreast with what is really afoot with the skunkbayweather.com-image story.
Face it, you’ve been fingered.
So far, the narrative stinks. (What other lies might we have been told.)
Q - Help us out here!
Quickly becoming disenchanted.
Source of Trident II embedded image: Image Source: Source: https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Dahlgren/Dahlgren_Centennial/Blog/SLBM/
Top secret smokeless propellant in a top secret SLBM capable of targeting aircraft thousands of miles away shot down by a top secret air defense missile?
… Please… Something better.
Will Q double down or come clean
Anons are a demanding bunch.