>>5333636

Q,

This site is bunk. Mostly just a static data set from "somewhere". Looks like they collected a bunch of people who used a hash tag, then turned around and propagated a lie that they are coordinating and synchronizing their tweets… They reference "twitter rooms"…. but there are no "chat rooms" on twitter… only direct messaging that allows you to add multiple people. If this is their "chat" then whatever. Also, unless they have back door access to twitter, they would not be able to access this information anyways… so how the hell would they know who are in these rooms and what they are talking about.

>>5334057

I've been paying attention. I know they are invading privacy which is a "back door" in that regards. If this group was able to get access to that information through a "business" deal, that also counts as a "back door".

Cocky? No, but this is my jam.

>>5334142

Nothing too exciting. Pretty basic as it only represents a shallow depth.

>>5334219

Which "internet infrastructure"…. the internet is distributed.

>>5334266

Essentially, DNSSEC works by digitally signing the DNS records at the authoritative DNS server with public-key cryptography. A number of new resource records have been introduced for this purpose: Resource Record Signature (RRSIG)

>>5334321

Thats why you view the XHR requests… i did not see any callbacks.

>>5334360

I have some code that could do better ;)

>>5334342

>https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2019-02-22-en

So i wonder what domains are trying to be high jacked….. twitter? facebook? russia russia russia?