Anonymous ID: 1946d6 Feb. 22, 2019, 4:34 p.m. No.5335249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5692

https://bidenfoundation.org/pillars/ending-violence-against-women/

 

At the Biden Foundation, we know that addressing violence against women requires multiple strategies, from changing social norms about violence to helping survivors rebuild their lives. As Vice President, Joe Biden drew attention to the high rates of dating violence experienced by teens and young women. He worked to reduce the nation’s backlog of rape kits and launched It’s On Us, which calls on everyone to create environments on college campuses where sexual assault is never acceptable. The Biden Foundation is proud to continue Joe Biden’s mission to end gender-based violence, once and for all.

Anonymous ID: 1946d6 Feb. 22, 2019, 4:34 p.m. No.5335256   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5262 >>5271 >>5323

>>5335248

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Anonymous ID: 1946d6 Feb. 22, 2019, 4:46 p.m. No.5335457   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5335363

https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/ira-political-polarization/

 

"Computational Propaganda"

 

It's a real thing– BUT IT'S ALL RUSSIA.

True?

Projection?

 

If Russia has __ capability, what does, for example, C_A + GOOGLE + AMAZON + etc = ?

Who historically has led in computer tech?

How much investment?

What is projection?

 

There is computational propaganda…?

There is…?

Just look…?

 

Projection