dChan
Anonymous ID: ed112d March 2, 2018, 2:02 p.m. No.534435   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4480 >>4494 >>4495 >>4501 >>4505 >>4521

>>534323

This post actually disproves most of the "delta" "work" being done around here lately.

 

Q is explaining that the POTUS may tweet and have a [15] delta but it could be meaningless (Q is missing).

However, once Q drops a [marker] (1 in this case), we should then be looking to POTUS tweets.

Q explains that the next tweet pair is confirmed by the [delta] matching the [marker] that was previously dropped.

This tweet pair included the "Q." In other words, because the [delta] matched the preceding [marker], we know it is relevant to Q.

 

What is this supposed to teach us?

You will see the POTUS tweeting often, with deltas that may seem significant, but if there is no surrounding Q context, it should mostly be ignored.

However, when Q is active, we should be watching the content of the drops, as well as any number [markers], and comparing to nearby POTUS tweets.

This is of course how it would have to work, otherwise the method opens up to endless interpretation, where anons can comb through hundreds of POTUS tweets and try to compare them to thousands of lines of Q drops. There is an endless possibility for reading tea leaves with that amount of data, and no constraints on where you are looking for correlations.

 

The CLOCK and GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL because screenshots with timestamps are what will be used to create side-by-side confirmation graphics as events unfold and further confirm the MAP.

I believe there are two "layers" of "FUTURE PROVES PAST"

One is the micro layer, where [markers] and content are used to predict POTUS tweets. This is done for a few reasons:

  • as a method for Q team and others to confirm go orders (fill in the blank marker method seems to be used for this)

  • to demonstrate authenticity of Q, and the valid connection to POTUS

  • to teach us how we should be comparing the drops to unfolding news and tweets, so once shit really starts happening we are generating memeable "proof" graphics instantly

 

Whatever methodology of the MAP we haven't uncovered so far is HIGHLY UNLIKELY to point to specific dates, as Q has told us everything is run based on game theory and the timeline is fluid depending on reactions of the cabal.

It is more likely that we have some sort of order of events, that if revealed will show the roadmap of confirmations that will be played out in the public.