>>5339052

SECURITY TEST # 1

qmap.pub = browser reports Sha1 fingerprint =

9F:B2:72:26:0A:30:6A:7D:09:1E:FA:4F:51:AC:76:E0:6C:D6:9D:54

actual= ( from https://www.grc.com/fingerprints.htm )

9F:B2:72:26:0A:30:6A:7D:09:1E:FA:4F:51:AC:76:E0:6C:D6:9D:54

GOOD result

SECURITY TEST # 2

https://8ch.net/qresearch/index.html = browser reports Sha1 fingerprint =

4A:02:4F:2B:34:9D:AE:65:94:F4:F7:D6:9F:39:00:17:3F:F0:E6:53

(also) 8ch.net/index.html

4A:02:4F:2B:34:9D:AE:65:94:F4:F7:D6:9F:39:00:17:3F:F0:E6:53

actual ( from https://www.grc.com/fingerprints.htm )

15:59:A5:E9:2A:D9:DE:62:E4:54:BC:5A:9E:15:2D:E2:CE:69:EB:D5

BAD result

can ANY security fags explain this?

>>5339547

simply pointing out that qmap is ACTUALLY secure, there is no intermediate appliance intercepting user connections

unlike 8ch.net

>>5339579

is this proof of government fuckery?

or simply assumption of an intermediate snooping appliance?

or maybe the honeypot in the DMZ at 8ch,net?

been a long time since i did Novell CNE work…

>>5339682

BO

please look into this.

and recommend to people to us a VPN at least they wont have actual ip addresses…