Swamp ape Brennan is beating his treasonous anti-Trump commie ISIL chest again? He's begging to go to prison! Make it happen @realDonaldTrump! No matter what else happens, I will not be happy until John Brennan is in prison where he belongs.
https://twitter.com/MrEarpLA/status/1099176296402305025
#SwampApeBrennan
"John Brennan is a Wahhabist convert"?
Don't know, but he sure is one screwed up guy. Something is short circuiting in his brain.
"CA Democrats Author Bill to Protect Sex Offenders Who Lure Minors Imagine my shock. They are making laws that keep them safe, because they themselves are the predators."
https://twitter.com/MrEarpLA/status/1099179943093784580
"California Democrats Protect Offenders Who Lure Minors"
Senate Bill 145 – State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblymember Susan Eggman (D-Stockton)
With their Senate Bill 145, California Democrats Senator Wiener and Assemblymember Eggman state they are trying to shield LGBT young people from having to automatically register as sex offenders for specified sex crimes. But the bill they have introduced does much more than that.
SB 145 would allow a sex offender who lures a minor with the intent to commit a felony (i.e. a sex act) the ability to escape registering as a sex offender as long as the offender is within 10 years of age of the minor. No specification is made as to whether the sexual offender is straight or LGBT.
The issue here is that the author’s press release states the bill is intended to bring parity in who has to register as a sex offender and who doesn’t, stipulating that: “SB 145 does not apply to intercourse of any kind with minors who are age 14 or younger. For those crimes, mandatory sex offender registration will continue to be the case for all forms of intercourse.” But the actual text of the bill goes much further than that.
As written, SB 145 would add a section to the state’s penal code (Section 290.55) stipulating that as long as the offender is “not more than 10 years older than the minor,” they are not automatically mandated to register as a sex offender.
For example, under SB 145, a 25-year-old luring a 15-year-old, a 22-year-old luring a 12-year-old, or an 19-year-old luring a 9-year-old would be shielded under the proposed legislation.
https://cssrc.us/content/california-democrats-protect-offenders-who-lure-minors
Anon please write the title of the songs you post
"Tactical question…"
kek
>Sorry guys just got home. Haven't previous breads, but have been checking drops all night. In regards to the link Q dropped
>https://www.forbes.com/sites/jodywestby/2016/09/24/7-days-before-obama-gives-away-internet-national-security/#36e49ff30d4e
>The most disturbing article I noticed was this line:
>>The most important of these is the assignment of Internet
>>Protocol Addresses (IP Addresses) to domain names.
>Sorry if this has been answered already, but is 8ch.net safe? Could the domain just vanish if a CA company just wills it?
Bookmark this IP address. This is the IP address for 8ch.net. If they hijack the DNS you can still go directly to the IP address.
104.18.104.234
There are backups and alternatives. Some are avail for public some not.
Universities for example have a separate version
Any updates on General Hayden who suffered a stroke?