POTUS, "We have now set the table beautifully"…."People that didn't have any idea- they didn't have a clue as to what was happening, they now know exactly what's happening. They see human trafficking…"
What did he mean?
post 1 of 2
POTUS, "We have now set the table beautifully"…."People that didn't have any idea- they didn't have a clue as to what was happening, they now know exactly what's happening. They see human trafficking…"
What did he mean?
post 1 of 2
>POTUS, "We have now set the table beautifully"…
post 2 of 2
Overhaul of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?
Take these cases from being YEARS LONG to
ONLY 101 DAYS TO JUDGMENT?
sauce:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a4c66bf0abd044fbe68eb5a/t/5c172e382b6a28e46b7666cb/1545023072087/Mod+Procedures.png?format=1500w
SET THE TABLE
Whistleblower case is CIVIL and could be parallel CRIMINAL
I'm trying to find sauce but I think in individual cases parties can request the Judge to approve modification of FRCP case-by-case basis
I make no assumptions. Speaking from experience and what I know.
Solicitor General filing in SCOTUS case that will be heard by SCOTUS 3/19/19…
A private relator also is not the person “charged with
responsibility to act in the circumstances” where evidence of FCA violations comes to light. 31 U.S.C.
3731(b)(2). Under Section 3730(b)(1), a private person
who learns of FCA violations and satisfies the statutory
prerequisites is entitled to file suit “for the person
and for the United States Government.” 31 U.S.C.
3730(b)(1). Nothing in the FCA or in any other federal
law, however, purports to require such a person to commence a qui tam suit. Rather, the person “charged with responsibility to act in the circumstances” is the Department of Justice officer whose official duties include
the investigation and remediation of a particular fraud.4
So again…speaking from experience and what I know….
Whistleblower case (CIVIL) can be parallel with CRIMINAL case
sauce:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-315/87681/20190208142752723_18-315bsacUnitedStates.pdf
All of the SCOTUS docs:
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/cochise-consultancy-inc-v-united-states-ex-rel-hunt/
TABLE IS SET
NOTABLE
Assets now subject to forfeiture in this case total approximately $1.7 billion = largest action brought under the DOJ Klepto Asset Recovery initiative
>not a moneyfag, so haven't really dug much into which is the moar accurate claim..
12/20/18 Treasury reported on how the global terrorist funding works and what role the banks play
sauce:
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm581
SEE PICS putting Treasury reports in graphic form
It also doesn't help that REAL NEWS about our GOVERNMENT is dry and requires some thinking. After a long day of work most people don't want to come home and DIG. Our media is really doing a disservice to this country.