>>534616

Delicious bread, Baker

>>534799

Right. Q team has only ever referred to Owls as bad actors. Sheesh. Big oversight.

>>534835

>>534839

There are definitely good owls, but Q team has never referenced owls as good.

>>534864

Indeed, Anon.

>>534902

This is why I'm hesitant to accept the 111-day "mirror" theory. No CIA news.

>>534925

The tweet says 30-year employee, yet the employee is 20 years old. Shifty.

>>534939

This one item gives me hope for the 111-day mirror. Otherwise, I'm not buying it.

>>534961

Exactly!

>>535017

Love the icon!

>>535126

Even though you've got a single post and could be a bot, I agree. Q team has never referred to owls as good people.

>>535158

Agreed

>>535197

Owls bad.

>>535209

It's a good reminder though. Anons, remember this:

>>535206

>>535263

I wish I could watch all of this tick-tock stuff real-time, but I haven't been able to find a Fox Live stream for more than two days now.

>>535331

There was always a Fox Live stream up somewhere until two days ago. I'm going through withdrawals.

>>535349

Thank you, thank you, thank you! This did not appear in any YouTube results.

>>535349

>>535368

>>535378

What search terms are you using to find these streams? Teach a man to fish.

"Fox News Live"

"Fox News Live Stream"

Both of these were former search terms of mine. Neither return the proper results. Since I'm not logged in, I cannot subscribe to a channel, so what search term is used?

>>535425

>>535436

I truly appreciate your inputs, Anons. This is important to me. I remember a single time where Hannity beat us to a scoop. I like to be on top of the news and this is a great help. God bless!