Sorry anon, but no.
>POTUS tweets almost every day
>MANY times per day
>Some planned, some unplanned
>Some in immediate response to events
>for MANY different reasons
>this adds up to a near infinite combination of "deltas", word spacing, content, etc.
Just because Q has said "everything has meaning" doesn't mean it formed the basis of what would be a BROKEN comms system.
Whatever messages are sent need to be CLEAR. This stupid "method" of reading the MAP isn't even a method.
You are reading tea leaves, and the "rules" you have set up amount to "only look at the ones that are brown and wet"
There has been a constant attempt both by shills and low-IQ anons to push over-complicated interpretations that obscure and distract.
Oldfags are here, and they see this mirror bullshit, 111 bullshit, and the new "Delta anon" bullshit, and see it for what it is. Your "find meaning in random Deltas" theory isn't even new. It's been floated plenty of times over the past couple months, and has been dismissed every time.
All this convoluted bullshit really diminishes the subtle genius of the actual comms, which strike a perfect balance between plausibly deniable and undeniable verification.
>pics related