Anonymous ID: 9658c4 March 2, 2018, 3:40 p.m. No.534922   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4943 >>5177

>>534435 (previous bread)

 

>You will see the POTUS tweeting often, with deltas that may seem significant, but if there is no surrounding Q context, it should mostly be ignored.

 

Complete and utter horseshit.

 

NINE times Q said "Everything has meaning"

 

The entire point of "FUTURE PROVES PAST" is that the timestamps on POTUS tweets prove that something significant is happening at a specific point in time IN THE PAST.

 

So why did Q clean out his board? Because we've entered phase II and we're supposed to pick up the subtle stuff, rather than the strange reading of Qleaves.

 

The idea of reversing the dates is to place posts Q made on the level of prophesy. Then we find some strange "missing x" and some anon points to a Q post in November and claims we need to look at news for Titanic? No. Just fucking no.

 

We have ongoing communication with Q through the mechanism of the timestamps on POTUS tweets and we know the important deltas of 0, 1 and any delta divisible by 5.

 

It's a simple and effective way of communicating. We're to look at the wording, the discrepancies, the spacing of the words, everything in the tweets. We're also to look at the posts in the marker time. But maybe you're one of those who claim it's about "random anons" or "magic Q helpers".

 

It's more like looking at the board, seeing someone get it right and calling attention to that. Simple guidance. Q said they would guide us.

 

The logic of that is indisputable and no amount of argument gets past that.

 

POTUS tweet times are not random.

The deltas of 0,1 and those divisible by 5 are specific and not random.

Q has called out attention this over and over again.

 

Of course, a real shill team would focus on trying to defeat Q's comm system. Get the anons focused on complete bullshit rather than the simple comm system Q gave us. Which is exactly what you are doing.

Anonymous ID: 9658c4 March 2, 2018, 4:14 p.m. No.535093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5150

>>534943

You are confusing the method with the example.

 

Expand Your Thinking.

 

I love the way one of the anons found a book by that title (an excellent find) and now is convinced THAT is what "expand your thinking" means. As if double meanings don't exist. Sometimes "expand your thinking" means you're taking a view that is too narrow. Which is what you are doing right now.

 

The Future Proves The Past

 

Timestamps Are Important

 

The delta of the timestamps is backward looking and IF the POTUS tweets (and resulting deltas) are random, then the deltas have no meaning. That is wrong because Q proved the timing of POTUS tweets is not random and the deltas have meaning.

 

Q was specific in which timestamps were markers and the timing of POTUS tweets is not random.

 

Q said "everything has meaning"

 

Yet, you are trying to say that the Q team cannot guide us without a Q post? That's insane. Q team can see when an anon gets the right answer and call attention it using the marker deltas.

 

You are claiming the answer is wrong, but logically your position is unsound because the delta's are backward looking and thus anything Q team wants to point to with a marker is specific. Nothing random about it. Nothing magic about seeing the correct answer, a piece of news that needs to be pointed to, an idea or anything and then calling attention to it.

 

How? By using the marker deltas from POTUS tweets.

 

Calling attention to a correct answer is not dropping classified info, it's simply helping us uncover information and put it together without violating any rules concerning classified info.

 

That's the whole point of building a parallel construction.

Anonymous ID: 9658c4 March 2, 2018, 4:31 p.m. No.535183   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>535150

 

Twaddle. These were the marker tweets for POTUS tweets yesterday.

 

01 Mar (1306-1326) d=20 >>526547

 

(1631-1951) d=20 >>527669

 

(1951-1952) d=1 >>528966

 

(2158-2159) d=1 >>529818

 

(2159-2204) d=5 >>529798

 

>>531653 The comms system Q gave us is functional and useful. It's not a fantasy cypher. Go to each of the links and take a look at each of the posts within the 1 minute time frame set by the marker delta. What information do they provide? Can you spot a specific item in each of them that might answer something specific to the tweets, or to past Q drops?

 

Do that with the whole month of February and you'll be amazed at what is revealed. As Q said, we have more than we know