Did you miss the part of Q's post that said…
"Nothing to See Here"?
Isn't that saying the video is fake; nothing to see? Q told us to ignore it.
Only conclusion to draw is:
-
You don't understand comms
-
You're a shill
-
You're a Krassenstein
Did you miss the part of Q's post that said…
"Nothing to See Here"?
Isn't that saying the video is fake; nothing to see? Q told us to ignore it.
Only conclusion to draw is:
You don't understand comms
You're a shill
You're a Krassenstein
ad hominems are the modus operandi of a shill.
How do you know the "rushing community" were real Patriots? Shills contributing to trying to discredit Q.
It's hard for me to believe you do not know the tactics of shills. Or maybe you do.
I understand. 34 Q posts that state 'nothing to see here'. Sometimes Q means it's fake; sometimes it means (((they))) are trying to take eyes off the story. Q cannot always, if ever, be specific. It is up to anons to figure it out.
Right, cuz shills never respond to Q posts. That's impossible.
Q didn't lose anything. He tried to warn us it was fake.
Why on earth would you think the K twins could ever outsmart POTUS and Qteam?
You thinking like this makes it easy to understand why you felt compelled to add the disclaimer, "I'm not a shill".
Look before you leap.
By responding about the memes, she consciously or sub-conciously acknowledged that they bother her. Not the smartest move on her part. Of course, she's not the quickest fox in the chase, so there's that.