Anonymous ID: 0aad2c Feb. 23, 2019, 12:57 p.m. No.5349185   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Been doing some digging into IPV4 and 6 and starting to get a picture but I might be wrong and I know you fags will point it out.

 

Background: (wiki-sorry but concise view)

“In the early 2000s, governments increasingly required support for IPv6 in new equipment. The US government, for example, specified in 2005 that the network backbones of all federal agencies had to be upgraded to IPv6 by June 30, 2008; this was completed before the deadline. In addition, the US government in 2010 required federal agencies to provide native dual-stacked IPv4/IPv6 access to external/public services by 2012, and internal clients were to utilize IPv6 by 2014.”

 

Thoughts:

IPV6 has been mandated in all devices since 2012 but we’re still using IPV4. Info becomes scarce on the rollout after 2012. What if intel agencies are using an IPV6 backbone/channel to spy? It would be a completely separate path for data, wouldn’t it?