>>5348008 (PB)
It's semantics but unless someone gains PERSONALLY it's not bribery.
It's kind of a weird public sector quid pro quo. It's actually not illegal in itself, but could be evidence of a broader conspiracy.
>>5348008 (PB)
It's semantics but unless someone gains PERSONALLY it's not bribery.
It's kind of a weird public sector quid pro quo. It's actually not illegal in itself, but could be evidence of a broader conspiracy.