>>5352898 >>5352913 >>5352934 >>5353004

All previous bread

Yes, as noted, this can be considered required reading.

Also, as you pointed out, there are other reads that Anons might keep at their fingertips when deciphering Q posts and studying the maps that fellow Anons create for reference.

A fairly light read:

PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS IN GUERRILLA WARFARE

https://fas.org/irp/cia/guerilla.htm

See:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86M00886R001300010029-9.pdf

See:

https://fas.org/irp/eprint/ci-glossary.pdf

See:

Goldman, Jan

Words of Intelligence: An Intelligence Professional's Lexicon for Domestic and Foreign Threats (2011).

Please make other suggestions.

TY Anons

Baker

Might a list of recommended reference readings be compiled for top of bread?

Military Spending by NATO Members

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/02/16/military-spending-by-nato-members

Quote

The United States has a point in noting that its commitment is disproportionately large. Last year it spent 3.6% of its GDP on defence, the highest ratio of any NATO member (and the highest total military budget in the world by a hefty margin). That is almost double the target of 2% of GDP that NATO members all agreed to in 2006. At the time six members reached the threshold; last year five did.

unQuote

>>5353650

Mad Maxine Waters will fall.