we aren't supposed to say
"Abortion is Murder"
but can we at least say
"parting out a full grown baby is lynching"
you are the one posting them here. If you think that they are fake, why did you post them?
i thought a lot about this and it occured to me that it might have been a double honey pot. They were let to have it and it was allowed because it was known tht they wouldn't be able to help themselves from fuckering it, so then what it was : a honey pot to make them think they had control, and that the others still maintained it behind the scenes so that the assholes in Californicate who think that they have this, instead have outted themselves as the control freaks facists we all know that they are.
so they are not revealled and can be removed.
just a theory.
only if the swetter photo is old the swetter photo guy has no neck. hot head does.
baker please ignore this self nominating shill. just my recommendation.
I guess for me if I see reports that seem wrong I would try and find out if there were any substance to them before I'd ever post them. The question 'is this thing that seems really slanderous, here is the slander in all the details, is this real or slander?
you repeat the slander by doing this. It's a cheep shill technique.
That is what it seemed to be to me, now you only had one post so I said. maybe this is a neophyte to commentary and posts and doesn't understand that the slander is repeated here.
so I asked you why you didn't go and investigate and only post it if it had sauce. all you had was a few screen caps which are easy to fake. No one prints that stuff that you put up without worrying about libel, as well they should.
if you report slander you don't repeat the details of it in an open channel. You might repeat the details at a trial.