>>535477 If you are referencing the D.C. Sniper Attacks, it was a man and a 17 year old male. Ten dead. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.C._sniper_attacks
Look. I was the OP for that cap. I did not read the entire 656 pages of the Annex 1 and 2, just glanced at it a little tiny bit. What I capped is text that was already in the Annex, not something that the EO changed. Just a sample of what this Annex contains.
Anybody who cares, ought to open the PDF and read it yourself. And it DOES need a lawfag with specialty in military code of justice, to figure out what the EO actually changes.
Ever since Q posted
AT&T PUSH
internet bill of rights
I have still not made up my mind whether this is a good thing we ought to push, or
Q telling us that it is something that AT&T is pushing. I am laying back until I know for sure. Meanwhile have some of these:::
> outside the fact that God does not care.
I don't think you know what you're talking about. Please read II Peter 3:9:
The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.