That which they braggadociosly attempted to occult will be what exposes and humbles them, you say…
you should make your own bread instead of restarting the same tired slide every time.
you didn't answer, you made an emotional appeal to a false authority.
So here, I'll ask you again:
Is it possible to create the element in (-f,1) where x “drops off” the grid, starting from the (na transform)?
Precisely.
It's a tactic to scare people off, even if they've gotten to the point where they've even considered trying to learn such things.
You just avoided the question again.
Why are you refusing to answer:
"Is it possible to create the element in (-f,1) where x “drops off” the grid, starting from the (na transform)?'''
You always try to project nonsense in attempt to derail.
Again.
More projection and attacking a strawman.
Why are you so afraid of the question?
You've completely changed your slide/tactic.
Did I touch a nerve?
And now you're using leftists insults?
"Smelly Walmart People", right?
Why did you suddenly freak out when I asked:
"Is it possible to create the element in (-f,1) where x “drops off” the grid, starting from the (na transform)"?
You said to ask you a question.
That's the only question I've asked since you told me to.
On a tuesday, when pluto is in the house of scorpio, while there is a full moon on the other side of the world.
And what three points are being trangulated?
How do one orient the space to pop into a different (presumably higher) dimension?
so the third point is a fractal node that expands out?
Does it always have a fixed position or is this an approximation of where the final result is, which can then be refined?
let me clarify fixed:
The ultimate point on the original fractal node…
Is that always the same point, or is it just that the point is always related to that specific node?
Perspective: Which is that third point of the triangle relating to?
A specific location within the node, or the node itself?
(Both would have a component of "fixation" and fluidity/malleability/tensory aspect to them. Kinda P is NP ish.)
-sigh-
Fine, we'll start the other way and work ourselves in, instead of out.
How would you describe the "point/perspective" that makes this zoom a thing?
It's not going to "random places".
What's what "point" called.
That… "fixation"?
Could "reverse" the video with the same effect on the "same line".
KEK, it's kind of a "timeless space" by its very nature.
"my turn" isn't asking me a question.
That's what I was asking you, just rephrased.
Some "point" on the "limit", which is infinite/infinitesimal.
Back to my question which you rephrased:
What's would you call that?
The perspective/pattern is simply how you're moving.
Can you explain what's going on in the second image and how you're defining those points/lines/colors?
Can you shift the perspective and give me a different view?
nooooow you wanna get into buddhabrot?