CAMPAIGN TO DEFEND AMERICA

2008 Presidential Campaign John McCain

Initial Submission: 11/13/07

Updated: 2/

…….against H.R. 1591, legislation to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and require that troops begin withdrawing from Iraq by October 2007. He failed to vote on the conference report. President Bush vetoed the bill. The bill

would have: Provided $91.5 billion for continued military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, as requested by the president, $1.2 billion for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles, $2.1 billion for soldier and veteran health care, $1 billion for Guard and Reserve units to purchase equipment, $7 billion for the victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and $2 billion for port security, mass transit security, airport security and several initiatives to address the shortcomings identified by the 9/11 Commission. [H.R. 1591, thomas.loc.gov; US Fed News, 4/26/07; McCain Military Issues Research Memo, 1/06/08]

McCain Voted Against Mandating Minimum Intervals Between Deployments for Troops. In 2007, McCain voted against an amendment that would mandate minimum intervals between deployments for troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. It would require active duty forces to be guaranteed as much time at home as they served while deployed. National Guard and reservists would be guaranteed three years at home between deployments. A “nay” was a vote in support of the president’s position. The motion failed 56-44. [CQ Floor Votes; HR 1585, Vote #341, 9/19/07]

McCain Voted Against Requiring Mandatory Downtime Between Tours Of Duty In Iraq. Senator McCain voted against requiring mandatory minimum downtime between tours of duty for troops serving in Iraq. The bill would provide active duty forces to be given as much time home as they were deployed. National Guard and reservists would be guaranteed three times the amount home as they served. [HR 1585, Vote #241, 7/11/07]

McCain Stood Out in Opposing Veterans’ Funding. McCain was one of only 13 Republicans to vote against an amendment that added over $400 million for inpatient and outpatient care for veterans.

[Senate Roll Call Vote #98, 4/26/06; DNC Release 1/9/08]

McCain Voted To Slash $2 Billion From U.S. Troops. McCain voted to cut $2 billion in crucial funding for Pennsylvania soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, including funding for military pay and benefits, operations and maintenance, Iraqi security force training programs and even medical care. Senator Harry Reid argued that the Santorum-backed amendment would “rob Peter to pay Paul.” [HR 4939, Vote 94, 4/26/06; Reid Statement, 4/26/06]

McCain Voted Against Funding for Body Armor: In 2003, McCain voted to table an amendment by Senator Mary Landrieu to the fiscal year 2003 supplemental appropriations bill for the Iraq war. Her amendment would have added more than $1 billion to the bill for the procurement of “National Guard and Reserve Equipment.” According to Landrieu, the amendment targeted “shortfalls identified by the National Guard and Reserve in their Unfunded Requirement lists,” including the “shortage of helmets, tents, bullet-proof inserts, and tactical vests.” Later in 2003, McCain voted to table an amendment by Senator Chris Dodd to an emergency supplemental war funding bill. The amendment would have added $322 million for small arms protection inserts (SAPI) body armor and battlefield cleanup. [Media Matters, 9/21/06; McCain Military Issues Research Memo, 1/06/08]

Consistently Voted To Spend More And More On Defense Spending…

McCain Voted for $70B for Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq With No Conditions. In 2007, McCain voted for a amendment to the Omnibus Appropriations Bill to provide $70 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with no conditions. A “yea” was a vote in support of the president’s position. The motion passed 70-25. [Council for a Livable World; CQ Floor Votes; HR 2764, Vote #439, 12/18/07

before deleting this over 300 page pdf of john mccain his biography, i'm dropping here then deleting from my files….

>>5357834

ooop same pdf sorry

s/b this image

>>5358084

and this is where I'm from, this tiny tiny country waaaaay down here in Kenya

Bush Like Hitler (is)was Vatican's Best Friend

His 2007 Executive Order gave diplomatic immunity and special

privileges to the Holy See.

By Greg Szymanski, JD

Feb. 11, 2008

Just like Hitler, George W. Bush is the papacy's good buddy and his

Executive Order of March 7, 2007, is a perfect example of how he caters to the wishes of the Vatican.

In that little known executive order Bush granted diplomatic immunity

and privileges to the members of the Holy See's Permanent Observer

Mission to the United Nations. Diplomatic immunity ensures safe passage for diplomats outside their home country and they are not subject to lawsuits or prosecution under the laws of the host country."

Prior to Bush's order, on July 1, 2004, the UN General Assembly adopted a Resolution, confirming and strengthening the rights of the Holy See as a Permanent Observer in the UN.

The Holy See now enjoys, among other things, the right to participate in the general debate of the General Assembly; the right of reply; the

right to have its communications issued and circulated directly as

official documents of the Assembly; and the right to co-sponsor draft

resolutions and decisions that make reference to the Holy See.

With the Vatican's power deeply entrenched in the UN and the politics of the U.S., it is wise to take a behind the scenes look at the Jesuit

Order and the Knights of Malta, two of the most important groups

advancing the Vatican-led New World Order's goal of a one world

government and religion.

The following information is from an internet page entitled Jesuit Wars. It provides a good synopsis of hidden Vatican and Jesuit power and how it operates.

In general it can be said that the Jesuits are mainly involved in:

False education

This is their main avenue for - initial and sustained - political

control! Through the socially, historically, and scientifically flawed education of youngsters and adults.

Sciences (and university research funding) for the purpose of

socio-psychological control (politics/civics/law, media/sociology,

psychiatry/healthcare, history/anthropology/astronomy)

Pseudo philosophy about: culture, science, civics, ethics, morality and

religion………

https://web.archive.org/web/20160604064447/http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/11-Feb-2008.html

According to Sister Charlotte, Vatican Literally Gets Away with Murder,

Torture, Sexual Abuse and Child Killing Behind the Walls of Cloistered

Convents

According to Sister Charlotte, Vatican Literally Gets Away with Murder, Torture, Sexual Abuse and Child Killing Behind the Walls of Cloistered Convents

Nun escapes Carmelite cloistered convent and tells the world about how Vatican condones the torture and killing of 'little nuns and their

babies' born after being raped by drunken Catholic priests.

By Greg Szymanski, JD

Jan. 29, 2008

The shocking testimony of Sister Charlotte Wells should have led to an

open investigation of murder and child killing in all cloistered Vatican

convents in the U.S. and around the world.

But instead, after Sister Charlotte went public with her shocking

account of murder, torture, sexual abuse and child killing behind the

walls of a Carmelite convent, the whole tragedy was hushed up after she

was murdered by the Pope's henchmen in the Jesuit Order.

And how such torture and killing can be ignored by Popes and government

leaders shows just how much power the Vatican really wields.

"Fr. Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit, told us about how Sister Charlotte

was killed for going public," said researcher and author of Vatican

Assassins, Eric Jon Phelps, adding Rivera said an undercover Jesuit

priest entered her life, having her killed for telling the truth.

Sister Charlotte's oral testimony can be heard on Greg Szymanski's radio

show aired Monday on The Investigative Journal.

Verifying Sister Charlotte's testimony were several other nuns, their

statements listed on the Jesus Is Lord web site. Here are comments about

Sister Charlotte on that courageous site, trying to alert the

American people:

"The testimony of Sister Charlotte is disturbing and shocking, but

provides important insights into the worst of convent life as well as

the dynamics of Romanism. It testifies with others such as "Maria Monk"

and "The Martyr in Black The Life Story of Sister Justina" (Lord

willing, both of these will be on the site one day) as well as the

testimonies of former priests such as Chiniquy (The Priest, the Woman

and the Confessional), Fresenborg (Thirty Years in Hell), and Hogan

(Auricular Confession and Popish Nunneries). Sis. Charlotte's testimony

seems incredible but only because most people do not know the history of

the Romish religion. One of our readers said this about Sis. Charlotte's

testimony:"

"Thank you for printing this testimony, I have been so troubled by what

I have read and I can believe what she said because I worked as a

waitress. And the priest and nuns would come in a order drinks while

wearing the habit. I had a friend that confronted one of the priests and

boy what a big blow up that was. He tried to get her fired and then they

really started coming in with the habit on and getting drunk. We told

them that it didn't look good for children to see them drinking

especially when they were Godly people (in the children's eyes.) It was

very eye opening to say the least. So I can understand some of what the

woman said. I would really like to pray for those other nuns. thank you

for your site and information." SR

"Here's an excerpt from a modern day Roman cloistered nun

(http://www.passionistnuns.org/vocationstories/findinglove/).This quote

is supposed to make a convent sound good but read between the lines and

you get a hollow feeling…

Being a Nun: I had always desired to enter more deeply into

the mystery of Jesus' love for us in His sacred Passion. Where better

than a Passionist Monastery where one takes a vow to promote devotion to

and grateful remembrance of the Passion of Jesus? Flowing out of this

main vow we take four other vows: Chastity,…….

https://web.archive.org/web/20160604064355/http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/29-Jan-2008.html

>>5358158

it is a page from a larger collection of corruptions/information on jesuits

I'll check for anymore on this

—————————–

Is Jesuit Fr. John Dear Another Sly Fox in the Hen House?

He both castigates and praises the Order for the purpose of confusing people about the Jesuit Order's main historical purpose of infiltration, duplicity and political meddling.

Feb 14, 2008

They never stop their Hegelian dialectic nonsense and the black robed

Jesuits are at it again, this time spreading propaganda in a January

2008 article written by Jesuit priest, Fr. John Dear, in the National Catholic Reporter.

The Hegelian dialectic method, used by Fr. Dear in this article, is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined conclusion.

At first glance, the article entitled "The Society of Jesus should renounce all military ties", appears to be anti-Jesuit. But when you

read closely it's another Jesuit attempt to confuse people about the real purpose and intent of the Society of Jesus.

The writer, sly as a Jesuit fox in the hen house, praises and castigates

the Jesuits in the same article, praising the works of founder Ignatius Loyola and the Order's historical main purpose while, at the same time, denouncing so-called rogues or bad seeds in the Order that need to be weeded out.

The first question must be raised: Why would the Vatican hierarchy allow a Jesuit, who takes the strict vow of obedience, to denounce the Order unless it was approved for another motive?

Secondly, if Fr. Dear was true to his colors, he would leave the satanic Jesuit influence, understanding Loyola and the Jesuits have been rotten to the core from its initial foundation in the mid 1500's.

So, what is Fr. Dear trying to do by both slamming some Jesuits but praising the Order's main purpose and cause? The purpose is a simple tactic of throwing some bad apples to the wolves but laying the wrong premise and foundation in people's minds that the Jesuit Order is basically good.

In other words, it's a way of meeting and heading off growing criticism in the U.S. that the Society of Jesus needs to change its evil ways.

It's another way of saying Jesuits are taking care of the problem because basically our organization from its foundation is basically good and we will weed out the bad apples.

However, nothing could be farther from the truth. According to many anti-Jesuit and Vatican researchers the Jesuits main purpose and its foundation was also based on a deception, infiltration and political

meddling for the purpose of hiding and spreading the wealth and power of the Vatican……..

https://web.archive.org/web/20160604064432/http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/14-Feb-2008.html

>>5358158

it was only the start of a very long article….🐸. I'll screen shot some of the pages for anons perusal maybe get some autistchrome juices flowing

>>5358158

moar……