Anonymous ID: ba88d2 Feb. 24, 2019, 3:55 a.m. No.5358694   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5358613

>>5358660 If you donโ€™t think the Queen of England is a lizard person, I donโ€™t even know you anymore. I think the politically correct term should be Reptoid, bc it sounds cool like Reptar.

>>5358665 ty

 

Look anything IS possible but personally I don't have enough real data to conclude that (yet). But I will keep my mind open to the (remote?) possibility.

But I think we are most probably (from real evidence) dealing with a different scenario.

Anonymous ID: ba88d2 Feb. 24, 2019, 4:55 a.m. No.5358979   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9014 >>9124

>>5358948

>>5358867

Maybe, maybe not.

He hasn't exactly been professionally active for a very long time. Just my opinion, but I think (and hope) that Hogan had more than enough character to see what was coiming and say 'no'.

That's why he's been retired for 20+ years- he's seen Hollywood, in person. Linda might have stories too.

Anonymous ID: ba88d2 Feb. 24, 2019, 5:19 a.m. No.5359124   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9139

>>5359045

>>5359074

>>5358979

 

His opinion, same as I've got a contrary opinion on Hogan.

Conjecture, extrapolation, opinion, not solid facts.

I think he stands on more solid ground with Atkinson and Cohen as they have worked until recently with few gaps and great successโ€ฆ

(Read between the lines on their success).

 

Last I'll say on Hogan as it's starting to be a slide.

 

But I do think we collectively (myself included) have to be careful about slandering people without much evidence, or purely on a gut feel (hnece my defence of Hogan, warranted or not).