TY Baker!
>>537036 (old bread)
Not arguing that Hussein & Co dint make sure they thot they covered all their big asses---
...BUT Think: they are All way to drug-addled and arrogant to seriously beiieve they should pre-write a pardon.
And thinking that would stick.. or that the Scalia 187 would cement that?
NAhhhh... the documenting the meeting was a blunder --no genius whatsoever at play just massive blunders... Even Scalia what a complete WASTE
The memo from Rice marks their entire adminisstration a massive BACKFIRE in thoguht
-- an attempted pre-pardon is still waay beyond their collective IQ and would not hold in the Lock Her Up wake anyway. They may not knw that, WE DO tho!
>IF WE SKIP 666 IT IS ONLY BECAUSE WE LACK CONVICTION!!!!LET THE NUMBERS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES!!!!!
o x y m o r o n
>I think the field has been set and we will simply have to wait until the start of the game.
Verily~
Keyword: CRIMES" …requires a legal finding…none would be in effect at the time of the pardon, ergo TOSS by SC
Its not like saying, "here are the car keys, if you crash the car I will forgive you".
Its like saying "He had no car when I forgave him for crashing it." Oxymron
Wil anybdy postthe Q Reddit here later for the Top Bread?
>ok seems I struck a nerve with things I have said.
One Time:
Nothing about this place has to do with anybodys nerves…. the "I this I that" is irrelevant and tiresome…an absolutely open mind is required, nt everywhere but Here,
which des not indicate is in effect during an effort to convince others you are correct and they are in error.
Thats Defense not Thinking… get it sorta now?
the pardn isnt required until the conviction is a fact tho, gaind from/result frm a charge or an indictment, which exists in Time.
The Pardon cannot come BEFORE the charge is Warranted.. an act that also occurs In Time - on paper served on the offender., Before the "hypothesis" is even formed…get it?
BUT…if ther DO start waiving pre-pardons around thaits even better since it PROVES pre-knowlege of the potential for prosecution / crime prior to an investigation being concluded
… "implied guilt" goes into effect…. being identified as needing any warrant or indictment in a Time before the investigation of that crime you are pre-pardoning.
"these people are stupid"
Good thinking but Totally Different than this pre-pardon thing… ? Apply your example and create it with Hussein and Trump…. Doesn;t work: Hussssein would hafta = Ford AND Nixon. Nixon Quit his job but had already been charged In Time with the offence… Ford as the Sitting President pardned him as a sitting President himsef, in the future ofthe crime and resgination of Nixon — but as a Human Being Ford chose to acknowlege, based on the exhaustive investigation, that at least Nixon hadn;t deliberately committed TREASON during his presidency. Hence the forward pardon by a sitting president.
See how that is different than a CRIMINAL and PRIOR president deciding he could pre-pardon ANYone?? Like I said, if ther are pre-pardons being waved around it just adds to negative evidence Mounting now in an unconcluded investigation.
>How is that not exactly what we are discussing?
Are yoo saying TRUMP will pardon Hussein????????????
>>How is that not exactly what we are discussing?
My position remains that Pre-Pardoning from a prior Not Sitting Presidnt is tantamount to self-imposed incrimination when contemplated against/among an array of other proven facts.
And PS it is too late to Quit like nixon did.
And ifhe becomes General of the World and the US charges him with Treason in the future of that… no way out. Which is why he hired Legal Counsel in 9 countries.