>>537430

Filtered shill. Bye bye.

>>537434

TY for reposting, anon.

>>537490

This is simply untrue. US Citizens can be declared unlawful enemy combatants, detained indefinitely at Guantanamo and tried by military tribunals.

Evidence:

In 2011, BHO issued a (non-binding) signing statement when he signed the 2011 NDAA, stating that he would not use the act to detain any US citizen in a military prison as authorized by the bill. Why would he have made such a (non-binding) statement, if the act did not enable him to make these detentions in the first place?

>>537574

Yes, I will laughing my arse off, when that finally occurs!

>>537578

Yeah, too bad! Ain't that a shame!

>>537612

Read between the lines of the three EOs, and put two and two together. What does they add up to, collectively?

>>537640

Yes, martial law is not necessary for the military tribunals to take place.

Martial law and the triumvirate would be a disaster for the country. It would mean the end of civil liberties entirely – BHO's wet dream.

>>537651

Yes, and not sure a military tribunal would need to recognize an advance/blanket pardon.