Anonymous ID: 3cefb0 Feb. 24, 2019, 7:46 p.m. No.5370956   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1001 >>1002 >>1229 >>1265 >>1348

>>5370313 (pb)

DJT tweets the meme.

The picture signifies "Let's Roll!"

"Let's roll!" forces the cue (=Q)

'Force' = smashing the cockpit doors (Flight 93) and taking back America

The cue is answered by all anons.

WWG1 = Anton is IDed by Trump. But he is not alone.

WGA = Anons are "anons" no longer. We tell the truth together.

This is as real as it gets.

Get ready to roll!

Anonymous ID: 3cefb0 Feb. 24, 2019, 8:06 p.m. No.5371229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1275 >>1504 >>1611

>>5370956

MOAR on Michael Anton's book, page 17

 

I now see a TON of evidence that Anton's book, which got a 17 tweet from DJT 14 Feb 2018 (title is a setup) is 17ing DJT right back.

 

Obviously, an Anon checking on this will look to page 17.

 

The crucial thing is footnote 3, but there is more.

 

Footnote 3 is attached to a line that mentions both Decius and Machiavelli. BOTH are personas that Anton HIMSELF has adopted in the past. Decius was the pseodonym for the Flight 93 essay and Anton wrote a book called The Suit in the overt style of Machiavelli. He is highlighting his previous roles as "actor" here. Q: what makes a GOOD show? GREAT actors.

 

Footnote 3 mentions symbolic numbers co-occuring. DJT has 17ed Anton, and Anton is 17ing him right back. Co-occurence.

 

It also mentions how Machiavelli (=Anton) was "contriving" to get the symbolic numbers right. So far as I can tell, the actual substance of footnotes 3 and 4 seems totally pointless. (I don't really know anything about possible symbolic numbers in the real Machiavelli. Ask around if you can. But it seems pointless as written). But both footnotes involve numbers. Anton is telling us that he is just playing with the text to give a 17 right back to DJT.