>>5370956
MOAR on Michael Anton's book, page 17
I now see a TON of evidence that Anton's book, which got a 17 tweet from DJT 14 Feb 2018 (title is a setup) is 17ing DJT right back.
Obviously, an Anon checking on this will look to page 17.
The crucial thing is footnote 3, but there is more.
Footnote 3 is attached to a line that mentions both Decius and Machiavelli. BOTH are personas that Anton HIMSELF has adopted in the past. Decius was the pseodonym for the Flight 93 essay and Anton wrote a book called The Suit in the overt style of Machiavelli. He is highlighting his previous roles as "actor" here. Q: what makes a GOOD show? GREAT actors.
Footnote 3 mentions symbolic numbers co-occuring. DJT has 17ed Anton, and Anton is 17ing him right back. Co-occurence.
It also mentions how Machiavelli (=Anton) was "contriving" to get the symbolic numbers right. So far as I can tell, the actual substance of footnotes 3 and 4 seems totally pointless. (I don't really know anything about possible symbolic numbers in the real Machiavelli. Ask around if you can. But it seems pointless as written). But both footnotes involve numbers. Anton is telling us that he is just playing with the text to give a 17 right back to DJT.