>>5372080 (pb)

I can see why you were having so many issues. this is a tricky gif to get to look good.

(working on 360 frames now)

>>5372585

Thanks… kinda works, but still not enough frames for a smooth gif.

the one i just did was 180, that one does 200..

I'm working on one that does 360 now.

>>5372708

Yep… might go for 720

it's strange how much the outside of the globe moves at that rate of speed.

>>5372746

kek, the one i just posted was 400

>>5372753

looks like

needs moar dig.

we should add a possible notables category.

stuff that needs moar digging.

Made it a video,

then into a gif,

optimized,

then this is the result of that…

300 frames,

best I could get with these methods.

no transparency

>>5372617