>>5377787 (lb)
Interesting WaPo timestamp choice.
I can make two 27's outta that.
One 27 would be 102 in May.
Should I be able to interpret some meaning from that?
>>5377787 (lb)
Interesting WaPo timestamp choice.
I can make two 27's outta that.
One 27 would be 102 in May.
Should I be able to interpret some meaning from that?
I think many anons missed this in the haste of a Q post
I don't think quads go to just any old 'lucky' anon.
Quints, not quads. Methinks in brain fart sometimes.
TFW you think U better undertand another aspect of Q's comm style.
This anon gets the opposite of offended now when called a retard. kek.