>>5380950 (pb)
It's naive I think of anon to feel that way however it's what we wish.
Patton is well connected but here is a question, if you were a . . . . why would you ever take the role of playing one?
He should come out and clearly say he isn't or just bow out of the scene all together. His 'joke' tweets were years before 'mee-two' and so they were within the context of the newly freed up channels of 2013: it was 'edgey' in his mind. and 'hip' in in mind. (how do I really know).
but as far as it goes he does seem a bit of a . . . . . and that's just too bad for him.
But if he does anything it will be the whole
'me thinks you protest too much'
his approach of not giving a shit and poking the bear? has he poked that bear lately?
if he's gathering evidence undercover he has to maintain his aura of creepiness.