>>5382015

Problem is when you have entire breads to drop…

I was working on a navigable map a while back of different people in "the cabal." Since most of my familiarity was with the relationships with the U.S. and the Muslim Brotherhood, that was where I started.

The goal was sort of like a flow chart, but with detail breakdowns and links for people to click through. Job, life, and other interests kind of took over, combined with obstacles in developing something that comprehensive. So, I kind of let the project stall.

It's probably closer to an end-game project. Documenting what happened and how everything was interlinked with the support of declassified documents. Looking back on the ambition, it was almost something of a wiki, though with a more specific structure using a time domain along the y axis with events in the middle, people on the left, and organizations on the right. The history of each person, each organization, and each event could be explored and easily navigated by hypertext.

A bit much for me to bite off, in retrospect, and based largely on reports others have done on the internet - supporting documents would have been another tier to incorporate with excerpts and the like.

>>5382306

Sometimes, posting something that is "true enough" but not factually sound gives you a good view of the people playing.

Consider how many people here are in the business of photoshopping AOC onto porn or lampooning any range of various people… And yet they hold Q to some kind of mystic standard of conduct during warfare.

In debates, I would regularly and knowingly post flawed arguments to see who would take the bait. Sometimes it was meant to expand the debate into another, interlinked issue. Others, it could be meant to gauge the other person's understanding of the topic. Still, other times, I was looking to judge their soul. Given any opportunity to deny the truth, would they go over my assertion with a fine-toothed comb while allowing blatant mistruths or untruths to dominate the general public?