>>5382688

I was checking those too. I noticed that 2703 was about Q and POTUS being interconnected and the 2704 was correcting a mistake that there wasn't. Then the image points to the "false correction". What if Q wanted the previous post to be in that precise place (2704) for future reference ("the map") and used the mistake as an excuse?

>>5382891

Oh, right. But 2704 is linking 2703. I missed the logical link in my previous post which could be obvious but the picture posted is another proof, so the reference to post 2704 "Mathematically impossible."

>>5382923

Notable

>>5383073

Ok so the picture isn't a reference to the post