Schitt for brains already said they were going to subpoena. There's just one teeny tiny problem. The law. Mueller has to keep his mouth shut. Barr decides what Congress gets to see, hahahaha
Banning for using a "name" that anons requested be used is going down a slippery slope. Last night was spent proving they are who they say they are. They came back to further prove they are an insider and then poof banned. He/she was not a regular anon in that they may have inside info on things we research. I really think banning was wrong. At least this early.
I agree with you and disagree with the ban. You do it for all or don't do it at all. Anons will run off namefaggers in short order without banning.
but tweeting shopped pics as a Q proof doesn't?
Last night, hw2 anon said they were not scared yet. It was an odd comment, but very relevant to me. hw2 spent majority of time proving they wre an insider. Had just dropped Deniro's name. Enough time was not given to see if they were going to be of help or not. Cutting off an insider to hw that could help us was not the way to go. Don't you think we could have used them in more than one way?
What if hw2 doesn't know how the chans work and couldn't possibly make their own thread or board? Banning cut off a possible pipeline.
What makes you think I wouldn't understand?
>the namefag tho had plenty of chances to drop something juicy and failed
maybe. Would like to have given more of a chance to prove a shill.
I'm not giving BV benefit of the doubt because of all the other namefags we have to deal with day in and day out. With Rfag and the others, they were given a chance to start their own thread. Why not this time? Seems someone was terribly jealous.
HW2, we can make a thread for so you so you won't get banned from here.
let us know when you have created a thread. Just be careful about doxxing