>>5382688

>Have Anons picked up on two Q posts whose picture filenames are 2703 and 2704?

Yes, I did.

All the filenames for images Q posts (from the beginning) are listed on the spreadsheet for just this reason.

Also in case they contain some sort of code for operators or others (who knows)

>>5382792

> and the 2704 was correcting a mistake that there wasn't.

Actually, there was an error, as >>5141350 noted (2704) but it was actually in >>5141235 (2702)

>Anon's

should have been Anons, the plain plural instead of singular possessive

>>5382972

>But 2704 is linking 2703.

Yes, I know. That's why that particular Q team person couldn't see the error he knew he made (because it was in >>5141235 (2702).

>realize you made a mistake but look in wrong place for it, see no error, confused.

I wasn't able to post on the board at the time it happened but understood that immediately.

>>5383117

>Ok so the picture isn't a reference to the post

No, Q's comment was an expression of frustration with expectations and those not accepting the mutliple 0 deltas. It was in that post that the error was made

>Anon's

instead of

>Anons

And when subsequent posts mentioned the error, Q team was looking at the wrong post and saw no error. That's all.

I don't mean to slide with this. Not all that important, I just noted it at the time.