Anonymous ID: 6ba01f Feb. 25, 2019, 6:02 p.m. No.5385629   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5677 >>5725 >>5729

anons look what lawfag found in the Special Counsel law while digging for the section RR mentioned and posted in notables pb

 

28 U.S. Code § 595. Congressional oversight

(c)Information Relating to Impeachment.—

An independent counsel shall advise the House of Representatives of any substantial and credible information which such independent counsel receives, in carrying out the independent counsel’s responsibilities under this chapter, that may constitute grounds for an impeachment

SHALL ADVISE = it is mandatory and AG BARR is NOT in the loop on any matters which might be grounds for impeachement and that means really ANY crime or potential crime at all - ESP is Mueller is a black hat he could notice anything cuz there is NO legal standard for impeachable offense

that means if he got anything they MUST be notified so if he does not the whole narrative collapses

silver bullet it is -

ps - the terms indpt. and special counsel are BOTH used is the law and regs - they are the same thing

 

anf for faggots here is the section RR referred to - this is a REG NOT a federal statute

§ 600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action -

(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;

(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and

(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

Anonymous ID: 6ba01f Feb. 25, 2019, 6:12 p.m. No.5385788   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5830 >>5905 >>5992 >>6028 >>6045

>>5385640

>If a baby is born alive, isn't it MURDER to kill him/her

 

No cuz these are cases where "alive" is not what you see in this picture anon

first of all there would never be a late term abortion unless the fetus was deformed or

if the mothers life is in danger and no c section is possible

a botched abortion in this case yeilds a very disturbing and defective "baby" that most attending physicians would never advise extreme life support measures nor would parents want it - after all that is the reason the abortion was initiated

 

anons have to understand that to many would be parents a severely deformed or diabled baby is not what they want and they have a choice - you want to take that choice away which is really wrong -

 

this is really political theater and very unfortunate

 

THAT SAID - if proof comes out that these procedures are not what i just described and are nefarious then by all means those involved are evil criminals

I have not seen any such proof - EVER

Q do you have it?

or are you playing politics with abortion?

i cannot believe it is just politics but i not then what on earth are you waiting for to expose it?

conclusion

methinks Q is a pro lifer and does not have the goods on these procedures

Anonymous ID: 6ba01f Feb. 25, 2019, 6:21 p.m. No.5385960   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5996 >>6043 >>6051

>>5385830

so then if the parents dont want a severely deformed half dead newborn they tried to abort you believe the state should take the infant from the parents and force the medical pros to revive or keep this alive at taxpayer expense?

then to continue with that forever?

really lets have some common sense anons

Anonymous ID: 6ba01f Feb. 25, 2019, 6:23 p.m. No.5385991   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5385830

or maybe you believe the state should force those unfirtunate would be parents to pay for and care for this ill fated newborn?

really anons

we live in a real world and sometimes babies are not meant to be

that is life not crimes

Anonymous ID: 6ba01f Feb. 25, 2019, 6:33 p.m. No.5386247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6335

>>5385996

not a ploy i agree that if were proven to be the case then prosecutions should occur

>>5386043

>born alive child

again i say this is not really a proper description and also begs the question - who orders the MD to do stuff he already said was not justified? and who pays for it?

>>5386051

> wait until after birth to euthanize.

this is NOT what occurred - it is a FAILED abotion anon not a borth and an execution

 

geez you anons are stuck on some shit you been taught by someone