baker, there were 4 Q posts in bread 6885. Only one of them had the tripcode. But we know that the other three were Q by ID. Those other three ought to be included in the Q posts. It was an unusual event, and it ought to be noted.
I don't see where Q said to not do that.
I do see a post that says, without a trip code, that the scraper site correctly didn't pick up the other trip codes.
My assumption was that this means that Q wants to post in a bread and not be known.
that's fine by me because I get the comms. But the one post is with the other three. And I see no trip coded Q post saying what you say. I do see a post that says it but it is not from Q.
You may have information I don't have.
I've noted it on my end, and anyone who looks at the post will see that there are 4 in the bread and will know.
so ya I think the other 3 should be put in with the one with the trip code and you are wrong, Q didn't say what you said unless he commed you privately.
wow.
I'm stunned.
I'm shaking.
you have so much power be so mean.
I've lurked and archived for a year and a half and so bullys can threaten me in my living room?
just wow.
but really I don't see where Q said that and that's fine because I know you're a dink and I don't really care what all you peopel think and I'm archiving myself and if I know it's a Q drop I'm going to cap it.
so when did Q say not to do that?
I still don't see it. but threatening me is easier.
if you people are MI, I'd say your mentors have failed you.