>>5388509 lb
He created a bit of confusion.
But I think it's mostly for interested parties. I may want to be able to have some input on what Q does, but have no real need to know what is going on, other than wait for proofs in the pudding, so to speak.
The people who are most confused and frustrated are those who have a need to try and control Q or who have the most to lose if Q pans out - IE, those who have the most to hide.
A bit on "these people are stupid" - this isn't necessarily to say that they are inept or incapable. A rational person can be expected to take something they want when it is offered to them. This is normal intelligence and rational behavior.
But let's say there is only one thing everyone needs, and you decide to take it because it is available. Again - this is normal, rational behavior. You need it, it is available, so take it.
But… There is a guy about three times your size who also really needs it, and who is more than capable of considering it "available" even though you claim it is yours.
This is where super-rationality comes into play, being able to understand how others will behave in their own rational interest (and some of them being super-rational, as well). Super-rationality allows you to grasp the idea that others are playing, as well, and to develop solutions and approaches that succeed in the greatest number of ways.
Stupid people either do not have this, and thus act like animals - or settle on solutions that have an absurd number of assumptions about how others will behave. Such as believing deception will never be caught, that control over the media will be maintained, that she will never lose, etc.
When your plan relies upon such things, the likelihood of one of these factors failing to meet expectations as time goes on increases. At some point, the music stops, and everyone has to scramble for a chair.
Of course, smart people realize that if you don't play stupid games, you don't have to worry about stupid prizes at the end.