>>>5389728 Baker Protocol: Do NOT Add Non-Tripcode posts from Q
TFW when baker policy happens to align with my own opinion on the whole episode.
Shadilay!
RE: the untripped Q posts shenanigans
The lesson here should be this:
Do you want to be the anon that just told the President to fuck off because you didn't know it was him… Then he decides to tripcode up and do a drop?
…One to nap on I guess?
mhmm.
The thrust of this undermessage has been going on for a few days now.
"You could be talking to anyone on the internet" is a very open statement, here especially.
You literally could be talking to Lyn deRothschild.
Or President Trump.
Make sure you really mean what you say :)
The other events that were key rt events were the moves.
I never took grabs because shit was chaotic, but I will say this:
all of the patriots moved to each new place together in agreement. It was… Magic. Everyone knew. I'm not kidding. Q asked anons where to go, a consensus was made, and all patriots went together.
-t. Saw every move except the first one from /pol/
>war etiquette in the social realm against the backdrop of what Q just threw a focus on.
I dunno the events of this week have been really making me think about the social interactions… Not just the normal consensus ones, but the interactions with hostiles…And this was before tonight happened.
I mean, sure, the shills patterns are normally obvious as fuck, but even [they] can pick up on things, after a damn year…
I've visited that thread from time to time, but I've mostly shared my own observations here in the stream.
you can only say so much in 5000 characters ;)
>Tandy
The first Tandy's after the Color Computers were actually competitive with the IBM's at the time, and quite good iirc..
I've actually looked into the path of Tandy/Ratshack.. I don't have the research handy but essentially tandy was viewed as an unwelcome upstart among the golden crop (of which included apple!) and killed, from the inside.
Then the company itself was intentionally run into the ground.