Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 3:31 a.m. No.5392171   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2205

>>5392081

>>5392084

as a philosopher this anon is compelled to point out that the perfect eternal energy bullshit just isnt philosophy at all.

not because there are no philosophers that might espouse such an idea (Spinoza, Hegel and perhaps even Schopenhauer are candidates as is Whitehead in a roundabout way). Rather the issue is that the view is simply dropped like a steaming load of shit without any context or connection into any philosophical tradition.

Also, there is a further philosophical point on which this ive seen quite a bit of confusion on the board over the last couple of days, namely that moral judgments are absolute and not relative. this is a prime example of a false dilemna and one of the most common confusions harbored by non-philosophers (or poor philosophers or those engaging in political speech as opposed to philosophical speech). moral laws are always either:

(1) Relative to the context in which they arise (so the facts on the ground are relevant to the truth or falsity of the judgment) or,

(2) Burdened with an implicit value judgment baked into the law itself.

case in point from the 10 commandments:

"thou shalt not kill".

this either means don't kill unless the cirumstances justify it or the actual commandment is construed as "thou shalt not murder" in which case the law must be interpreted using a value judgment as to what it is that distinguishes murder from killing.

note here that (((they))) prey upon this confusion at every turn. abortion on demand for a long time has been justified by (((them))) by citing outlier cases (danger to the mother's life and that sort of thing) in which there are conflicting intuitions as to the moral status of an abortion performed in that context. it's is a bullshit argument trading on situations that are better analysed as exceptions that prove the general rule.

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 3:38 a.m. No.5392201   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2221 >>2226

>>5392181

>They are after my child and if you don't do something, I will do something.

you're either giving Q, POTUS, or this board an ultimatum. not a very good idea. we all know that this shit is going on and we see progress fighting it every day. not every individual case is going to be handled properly and they dont have to be as long moves are being made to rectify the macro situation. but (((you))) know that and are just here to wind people up hoping that they do something stupid. we fucking see you.

so let your clock fucking tick away. and when time runs out KYS.

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 3:42 a.m. No.5392219   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2275

>>5392205

>you're waving your dick in the face of the greatest philosopher alive on this earth at this time.

that's a pretty fucking heavy claim there fuckwit. what this anon has studied is significantly beyond your capabilities and has nothing to do with consensus - if it did why the fuck would i put my philosophical efforts into this place? now fuck off, shove a crystal into your navel and contemplate the fucking lint that you let build up in there.

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 3:48 a.m. No.5392242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2279 >>2306

>>5392226

>The difference between you and I is; I'm trying to protect a child. You are just trying to be "cool" on 8Chan.

no, i dont need any positive reinforcement from 8chan. and if youre trying to protect a child then fucking get on with it instead bringing ultimatums here.

muh if you dont do anything about i will. fucking perfect. get on with it and quit fucking positioning it as POTUS isnt doing anything about the issue.

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 3:59 a.m. No.5392273   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>5392253

>It's the story of Horus, rebranded and retold.

i thought (((you))) were trying to save children. or is that more a sideline thing that you get into when you get tired of shilling for ancient egyptian dieties and eastern mystical crystal gazing?

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 4:13 a.m. No.5392330   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2361

>5392279

>And… YOU are the problem… YOU who are complacent with the status quo… YOU who just accept the fact our own gov't is participating in the evil we are fighting here… YOU, the lemming, "yes man", faggot.

 

says the fuckwit engaged in shilling horus and the kemet. (((you))) said you would do something about it. why the fuck havent you?

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 4:19 a.m. No.5392349   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>5392306

>"Hey look, this dude is mad that his child is being molested and no one is doing about it. He even claims the court is complicit. And that if nothing is done, he'll be forced to do something drastic. What a loser, amirite?" - (You)

 

the pic of the pool at the horus luxury hotel has immense relevance to (((your))) so-called situation.

Anonymous ID: d3aed2 Feb. 26, 2019, 4:32 a.m. No.5392391   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2435

>139e29

is most certainly a shill of the worst sort. the narrative being pushed is that we (Q, POTUS, and the glorious collection of anons that populate this board) must drop everything to take care of (((their))) issue.

but, the progress in mapping relationships amongst suspected high-level pedos has been significant the last period here. so, what we are being asked to do is to stop fighting the WAR in order to engage in a single BATTLE.

this is another example of the types of manipulation the cabal has subjected the populous to over the past 50 years.

another example goes like this:

look at that economic inequality; its so fucking unfair. that group of (insert favorite cause) needs taking care of, and that one and those folk over there as well.

oh, but dont dare look behind the curtain where the fucking wizard of oz is controlling monetary policy via the fed causing structural inequality and injustice within the financial system and economy as a whole.

the strategy employed is convince us to concede fixing the structural keynesian macroeconomic issues and lets just put some bandaids on all the festering microeconomic wounds; concede the WAR in order to fight a single battle.

even if the shill is actually an anon (which i highly doubt) we shouldnt give an ounce of credence to stategic or tactical advice from such a source.