>>5394117 (lb re: shilling)
IMO, the anon you responded to has a more accurate read on the situation. Anons have no role that's necessary. Americans are already prepared to learn how corrupt our gov't has been for decades. Most already suspect it (not every has to get it - there will be enough that insist that justice be served). The far more likely explanation of what's happening here is what the anon you responded to stated - anons are assisting the enemy. The militant refusal to consider that possibility makes me think they'll probably stay in the dark until it's too late for us to take any meaningful action. What I haven't figured out yet is if Q works for the left or for Trump. I'm hoping Trump isn't controlled op but I'm keeping my eyes open and I'll let the evidence inform me. I find it extremely disappointing that the day he took office he no longer cared about seeing Hillary held accountable. I have other things I've noted too that shows his goal of returning power to the people also went out the window.