>>5397142 (lb)

I'd wage Q posts here all the time as anon. The context of Q's posts are in line with the context of the bread so we know he's here reading/watching. I think that it was a mistake not meant for us. Like he was doing double duty phonefagging and made a mistake.and noticed that it was picked up by a scraper site or two.

8ch txt > 8ch > txt > 8ch > 8ch (SUPPOSED TO BE TX FUCK PLEASE DELET) No big deal. We're all humans.

>>5397294

I have noticed the you/we switch.

Seems like another sec test is in order to verify all the scraper sites are working properly. I had to rejigger mine last night to exclude anon Q as same bread tripcode Q. I thought they all worked like that - but I guess the others were doing it manually.

>>5397434