Anonymous ID: e9a5ce Feb. 26, 2019, 11:24 a.m. No.5397236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

1/2

1/2

 

Went looking for "Director of Strategy" based on an Anon's posting of Awan's business card. ( >>5378861 bread #6875)

Instead, fell into a rabbit hole. "Director of Strategy" landed me on a London embassy page from February 2014 and at the bottom of the page where all the

juicy bits are, was a notation on "Responses" to three Blue Lantern cases. Whutza Blue Lantern case?

 

Apparently there is a program in place to verify that supplies/equipment sold to other countries by the USG are being used appropriately and within established guidelines. IOW,

if we sell something to country "A", the item isn't supposed to be resold to country "B", especially when country "B" may be sanctioned. So I started

looking around for Blue Lantern OIG reports. Found a report from 2006 that included case studies, one (#7) for "unauthorized transfer" from an unnamed

middle eastern country to South America which went like this:

 

US sells helicopters to Middle East country's military. The ME military sold those helicopters to a private ME company who then sold them a private user

in South America who then sold them to a bank in a different South American country. (Reading this triggered thoughts of the brothers' Isaias banking

escapades.)

 

Then I found this article on the website "War is Boring":

by JOSEPH TREVITHICK & ROBERT BECKHUSEN

To save money and free up military choppers for combat operations, the U.S. military has paid contractors billions of dollars since 2008

to ferry soldiers and supplies around Afghanistan. But the Pentagon’s inspector general later discovered some exceedingly shady—and dangerous—behavior

on the part of the contractors, according to a 2014 report that War Is Boring obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.

 

The investigators found that some of the private helicopters were in disrepair, and the contractors flew troops without armored plates.

The contractors painted their helicopters in military colors, against the Pentagon’s orders—potentially exposing their passengers to hostile fire.

 

And we learned that a Colombian military firm once investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration allegedly ripped off the U.S. military for

thousands of dollars—while its employees sat in on sensitive briefings without proper security clearances.

 

Further down the article is this little nugget:

The auditors determined one Colombian contractor — Vertical de Aviación — overcharged American authorities more than $140,000. The Pentagon’s watchdog "wasn’t

sure" whether this was the only instance when officials overpaid for private contractor flights.

 

We don’t know if the Pentagon’s investigators were aware of it, but they would have had good reason

to be wary of the Bogota-based contractor. In two January 2010 diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks, U.S. federal law enforcement

agents suspected the company—formerly known as Helitaxi—and its owner of having ties with money launderers and drug traffickers.

 

"DEA confirms that the owner of Helitaxi, Byron Lopez Salazar, is a known money-launderer,” the U.S.

embassy in Bogota stated in a cable. “His name is indexed in 20 DEA case files."

Anonymous ID: e9a5ce Feb. 26, 2019, 11:25 a.m. No.5397249   🗄️.is 🔗kun

2/2

So then I headed over to USAspending.gov and tried the Columbian Contractor from the article: Vertical de Aviacion. Sure enough,

they were in the database to the tune of ~$580 Million dollars. As disturbing as the Afghani flights are, they were also paid for flights

withing Columbia. (HeliTaxi did not show up)

 

I'm sure there is more to be discovered in Blue Lantern cases - but at a minimum based on just two documents, what I think I have is:

  • A program that's supposed to monitor fuggery - Blue Lantern

  • US Helicopter sales to the mideast that end up in Columbia, South America

  • Columbians given a contract by the USG to fly soldiers and supplies around Afghanistan, a known poppy production country

  • Yet another instance of uncleared Foreign civilians (employed by a known drug trafficker/money lauderer) sitting in on sensitive meetings.

  • Money Launders and drug traffickers being paid hundreds of millions of dollars by the USG

  • Probable kickbacks - spitball

  • Probable pipeline of poppy products going from Afghanistan to Columbia and then from Columbia into the US - another spitball

  • Possible Isaias brother's bank? Really spitball, but it's sleazy enough to fit.

Yeah. I think that's it so far on the ME/Columbia connection.

 

Then there is this: a 1992 OIG audit that found "Israel "is systematically violating U.S. arms control laws."

At the time, the executive and some members of the legislative branch were deeply concerned about the ongoing Israeli diversion to China of military

technology from the controversial American-funded Lavi jet fighter project. Secretary of State James A. Baker Baker was also holding up an Israeli

request for $10 billion in loan guarantees to pressure the Israelis to halt construction of illegal settlements on the West Bank. Report of Audit reveals a highly dysfunctional inspection regime dominated by political infighting. An attached memo from the Bureau of

Politico-Military Affairs (PM) challenged the inspector general's premises.

 

"There are two glaring deficiencies in this section. First, the report is premised on two notions; that if a story appears in an intelligence publication, it must be true;

that if some agency not charged with responsibility for a program (in this case low level officials in ACDA) [U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency],

they must be correct. As is indicated below, these assumptions do not always pertain. It is not PM's job to react in a knee-jerk fashion to intelligence reports, but to analyze and investigate."

 

Release notes. On August 14, 2009 the US State Department "denied in full" IRmep's February 14, 2009 Freedom of Information Act request for the Funk

audit. IRmep appealed twice to the US Department of State Appeals Review Panel, winning a redacted release on August 1, 2011.

 

Probably a lot moar moar there if anyone is interested in a big dig.

 

https://foia.state.gov/Search/results.aspx?searchText=%22director+of+strategy%22&beginDate=&endDate=&publishedBeginDate=&publishedEndDate=&caseNumber=

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/recipient/f755a994-30f6-9cc1-f2f1-3803035899ec-P

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sysparm_referring_url=tear_off&view=true&sys_id=eebde4f1dbf51340528c750e0f961959

(state.gov doc won't archive)

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/a-colombian-merc-firm-was-the-pentagon-s-shadiest-afghanistan-contractor-38be49b01da8

(archive of war is boring: http://archive.fo/NqRJv#selection-567.0-567.20)

http://www.israellobby.org/Audit/default.asp

Anonymous ID: e9a5ce Feb. 26, 2019, 11:30 a.m. No.5397337   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The interesting thing about Blue Lantern, especially the 1992 case, is that it sounds very similar to the AGT case cited earlier today in notables.( >>5396005 in #6897) US equipment goes to the bad guys and the investigation is covered up.