i was here. it was never verified.
ids are not 100% infallible.
all he did was trip Test 3 with a sig. that is not explicit verification.
Should the integrity of future comms be preserved.
what i said is exactly what is in the picture you posted. nothing was explicitly verified. use caps more.
i see the consensus. what is missing is Q's validation of that consensus.
i saw them all real time.
so private that he uses his uid from the Q post? explain the purpose in that?
do you think there is a reason Q is not verifying those were his posts?
Q has in the past explicitly confirmed everything else which came into question.
so instincts are now confirmations. open the floodgates for disinfo?
in the future will you feel like an anon post is Q. what if it isnt. and goes unverified. what then.
what exactly are you saying is the purpose tho
ids are not 100% accurate 100% of times
i understand the premise of the purpose. but we need verification or the foundation for future comms such as those will be on sand not stone. we need to write the foundation in stone first.
otherwise… anyone can just pop on the board, claim to be Q… say the 'right things' create the 'right feels'… and then what.
the comms were about not using trips and not using sigs. how are you going to verify that in future private comms?
Q
are you going to have private unsigned untripped board comms in the future and come here to tell us that you were but then not verify that outright?
o7