dChan
Anonymous ID: cc6b85 Feb. 28, 2019, 6:32 a.m. No.5433068   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3187 >>3378

You were saying? Just the #wapo doing what the Washington Post does.

twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1101123522779402240

/twitter.com/DavidNakamura/status/1100791842562400257

Anonymous ID: cc6b85 Feb. 28, 2019, 6:44 a.m. No.5433186   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3207 >>3222 >>3275 >>3294

>>5433127

>Thank you for speaking up patriot.

You are at 19 posts so I am not defending you either

But the truth is the truth

The BO does not ban Ebot, but I've seen the BO ban someone saying something to the effect of you need a time out have ban

It's just arbitrary and weird and I have often wondered if I would be banned for not agreeing with the 'group think' at the so call amnons that claim free speech

 

Case in point / agree with me / or be attacked as a newfag / KYS etc

 

SEE this imbecile

>>5433145

>"Ebot" is an oldfag shitposter or you are a newfag and should just lurk moar or KYS

Anonymous ID: cc6b85 Feb. 28, 2019, 6:52 a.m. No.5433267   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3312

>>5433207

>bans were banned (ha) a year ago-ish.

Would you like me to go get the screen cap of the BO banning someone a few months ago or so for precisely what I said / you need a time out have a ban.

The comment was so contrary to the claims of 'free speech' here that I made a snip

It's on an external hard I can go get and post next bread for you to see with all the info

So, no bans weren't actually banned as you claim

Anonymous ID: cc6b85 Feb. 28, 2019, 6:57 a.m. No.5433312   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3329

>>5433294

>If you're going to spread disinfo about our site or our mods, you'll have a hard time doing it without an anon piping up with clarifying info to show you're lying just to stir up FUD.

I'll get the screen cap

to prove exactly what I said

see >>5433267