Same to you, Swordanon!
>Not that any of them will.
Context of his responses were in relation to an ongoing investigation that belongs to the SC in its entirety. Cohen has a walking/talking "get out of jail free" card. He could call Trump a pedo, and as long as the question ties back to the SC investigation, he can get away with it. SC has "jurisdiction" over the case. If an AG went AWOL and went after Cohen for lying, they'd get Trumped by Mueller.
>RR
Dems really want to know what is in those boxes
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📁
Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)
Cohen raid by FBI?
Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?
SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?
RR signed off?
What other docs were collected?
How many places raided?
Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?
Think logically.
How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
Who has everything?
Methods which info collected/ obtained?
Admissible in the court of law?
Insert Rudy.
First public statement.
“It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html📁
Think resignations.
Who has the POWER?
If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?
Why are we here?
Public forum.
World watching.
Sharing of intel to bad actors?
Purpose?
Not confirming SC is on /team/.
Question everything.
Timing important.
Planned?
Q