Anonymous ID: 1b7aca Feb. 28, 2019, 8:16 a.m. No.5434189   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Look at these.

Just look at them.

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Do patriots question this?

Do patriots think for themselves, especially when it is obvious something is amiss?

Or not?

 

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

 

WAKE UP PEOPLE

FIGHT

Anonymous ID: 1b7aca Feb. 28, 2019, 8:20 a.m. No.5434234   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5434199

Indeed, "anon"?

So there is NO AI here, right, just "clown operators", spewing reams of filler, for thousands of threads and millions of posts… that COULDN'T be ai, right?

Meanwhile, all the tech giants that have feverishly invested billions in ai for reasons that aren't altogether clear would NOT be using it to control the internet, even though we know in principle that would not be hard to do?

Am I getting what you're saying right, "anon"?

Anonymous ID: 1b7aca Feb. 28, 2019, 8:23 a.m. No.5434267   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5434235

HOW DO YOU CONTROL NARRATIVE?

Compare Mac Culk to this video:

 

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ