>>5440508 pb

>>5432381 pb notable

[P] = Pictet than Payseur?

Payseur = paymaster,

Jewish, in change of the finances of Kings;

http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/01/so-now-payseur-myth.html?m=1

^^^ "So Now, The Payseur Myth "

It's not a real name - it's a station.

Picet ?

Though a lot of genealogy, in general, is back-dated - names changes, duplicate bios.

In official history records:

Picet is a distant descendant of the "Emperor of Constantinople and Jerusalem."

There are Comyn's in there as well =( That means the Emperors From the East - who became the Kings of England and/ or the names of whose lineages the English royalty usurped..?

(per scientist , physicist, statistician , historian Russian Fomenko [study first before you judge]))

Some Ancestors of Picet were warriors 'Templars'

Even with the red cross shown on their outfits - So there's that Swiss /Royalty/ Knights Templar connection in .Pictet's background. Not a myth of Royal descent as with the Payseur.

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/185843922095558282/

I think to understand the blood lines you have to recognize the true history as much as possible and not the lies which have been told.

I have no idea who "P" is, But if Pictet created Switzerland I'd say he'd have a better chance at "top of the pyramid" than Payseur.?

Payseur story seems like a myth / misdirection and has to me ever I since I read the females in the family found the deeds and financial instruments in the attic - where they had been forgotten.

Really?